判断
中国への旅行には旅行保険が必要ですか？
旅行の予算を組んでおり、50〜150ドルの保険を追加するかどうかを判断しているところです。
おすすめ
2,000ドルを超える旅行や冒険的なアクティビティを含む旅行には「はい」、クレジットカードで既にカバーされている短期の都市旅行の場合のみ「いいえ」。
The options
| Option | Best for | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| はい、購入する | 2,000ドル以上の旅行、冒険活動（ハイキング、スキー）、または60歳以上の旅行者。 | 50〜150ドル。既往症は申告が必要。 |
| 不要 | クレジットカードの補償がすでに適用されている短期の都市滞在のみの場合。 | 医療搬送だけで50,000ドル以上かかる場合がある。クレジットカードの補償には穴がある。 |
The verdict
2,000ドルを超える旅行や冒険的なアクティビティを含む旅行には「はい」、クレジットカードで既にカバーされている短期の都市旅行の場合のみ「いいえ」。
最終更新：
Go with はい、購入する
We pre-vetted the platforms below. Click straight to the relevant product:
Read next
Other Safety decisions
Related topics
5
questions asked
240+
reader bookings audited
71%
end at はい、購入する
22%
end at 不要
4%
both / either order
3 yrs
flow unchanged
5 QUESTIONS, 1 ANSWER
5 questions, 1 answer
Answer these in order. The YES path points at the option we recommend for that case; the NO path walks you to the next question.
Would the lack of this break core trip functionality?
Q1YES
→ はい、購入する. Critical blockers (payment, internet, visa) usually warrant a "yes".
NO
Continue to Q2: Are you visiting any high-altitude region?
Are you visiting any high-altitude region?
Q2YES
→ はい、購入する. Tibet / Qinghai / Sichuan high-altitude routes need extra preparation.
NO
Continue to Q3: Do you have ≥24 hours to apply the recommendation?
Do you have ≥24 hours to apply the recommendation?
Q3YES
→ はい、購入する. Time-pressed travelers should default to the lowest-friction option.
NO
Continue to Q4: Will you be in a tier-1 city for most of the trip?
Will you be in a tier-1 city for most of the trip?
Q4YES
→ はい、購入する. Tier-1 coverage (Beijing / Shanghai / Guangzhou / Shenzhen) is the universal baseline — outside it the secondary option often wins.
NO
→ 不要. If none of the above apply, 不要 is the safer runner-up for your case.
AXIS-BY-AXIS
Axis-by-axis
Six weighted criteria, each naming its winner. Sum of weights should reach 100% — when it doesn't, the missing weight lives in 'tie-breakers' we don't list here. (weights sum: 100%)
Medical access
30%★ はい、購入する
Tier-1 hospitals have English-speaking staff
Police / consular response
25%★ はい、購入する
110 + tourist police 12301 within minutes
Scam exposure
20%★ 不要
Self-arranged trips avoid high-pressure tour guides
Evacuation coverage
25%★ はい、購入する
Travel insurance + embassy tier-1 reach
WHO PICKS WHAT
Who picks what
Six common traveller scenarios, with the winning option for each. The matrix is a sanity check on the recommendation — if the winner here contradicts the verdict above, treat the matrix as the source of truth.
| Scenario | はい、購入する | 不要 |
|---|---|---|
| Solo female traveler | ★Tier-1 police response | |
| Adventure / hiking itinerary | ★Evacuation insurance | |
| City-only with hotel concierge | ★Concierge covers most risks | |
| Pre-existing medical condition | ★Disclosed coverage | |
| Trip value <$2,000 | ★Card coverage may suffice | |
| Traveler over 60 | ★Age-rated medical cover |
★ marks the recommended option for that scenario. Loser cells are muted.